Errors and warnings

chain.report, Blockpit or CoinTracking — when which tool?

Last reviewed: August 15, 2026
All three produce crypto tax reports for Germany. Blockpit and CoinTracking are the well-known full suites. chain.report is built for the moment the other tool only still shows warnings: missing prices, balance gaps, misread DeFi. The calculation is only as good as the history.
The facts in brief
All threeProduce crypto tax reports for Germany
Blockpit / CoinTrackingThe well-known full-suite tools
chain.reportCloses the gaps when the other tool only warns

When do you stay in the current tool?

When import, inventory and classification already close. Then you do not need a switch. A second tool does not replace a missing wallet.

When is CleanUp the shorter path?

When the warning list is longer than the report. Then the gap is the problem, not the button. chain.report turns the warning into the missing source.

Short comparison

chain.reportBlockpitCoinTracking
StrengthClosing data gapsDACH automationTracker + many reports
When the tool warnsCleanUp with a next stepHints you work throughWarnings you work through
DE holding periodYesYesYes
AT average costYes (AVCO)YesYes

Frequently asked questions

Is chain.report a CoinTracking clone?

No. The difference is CleanUp: close the gaps before the PDF is generated — not another warning list.

Can I keep using CoinTracking or Blockpit exports?

Yes, as one source. The years and wallets that trigger the warning still have to be filled in.

Which tool does the tax office accept?

None automatically. What is accepted is a traceable history. The software is only as reviewable as its data.

Read next

This guide structures the data issues and common German administrative practice. It is not tax advice. The assessment in your case stays with you and your tax advisor.

If the warning is the result, open the history

Import the same inventory and let CleanUp show the gap. Then the report is an explanation, not a red list.

Start for free